Reply to Fries et al . and Valentin
نویسندگان
چکیده
TO THE EDITOR—We thank Fries et al [1] and Valentin et al [2] for their comments about our study [3] and for providing their data. Although their results did not control for confounders, their experience adds to previous work showing that consultation with an infectious diseases specialist improves the management and prognosis of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), as reviewed in our article. Valentin et al [1] asked for information about adherence to the whole bundle of management parameters during the preintervention and intervention periods in our study. This information could not be calculated, because not all of the specific indicators included in the bundle were feasible for all patients, which is why we provided adherence to each specific indicator during the preintervention and intervention periods. They also asked about the impact of the bundle on specific highrisk populations, because they did not find a significant reduction in mortality among elderly patients and those with a high Pitt score or Charlson index. Because older age, a high Pitt score, and a high Charlson index in themselves are associated with an increased risk of death, much bigger sample sizes would be needed to demonstrate the impact of any
منابع مشابه
Reply to “A Critical Review of Proximal Fibular Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis”
Proximal fibular osteotomy is a surgical procedure that has evoked significant interest and controversy in the recent past. Vaishya et al have made a significant effort in compiling the available evidence on the topic. However, we would like to make some significant suggestions and additions to the findings in their manuscript.
متن کاملEnvironmental gamma radiation: a comment (Letter to the Editor)
Editor, I read the recent publication by Toossi et al. with a great interest (1). Toossi et al. concluded that “Average gonad and bone marrow doses for North Khorasan, Boshehr and Hormozgan provinces were less than the corresponding values for normal area (2).” There are some facts on this report to be concerned. I agree that the detected levels might be high in the mentioned area, but th...
متن کاملLetter to editor
Dear Prof. Mozdarani,I would like to discuss about some important aspects regarding the article published in, "Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2012 10(2): 89-94“ with title of “Patient doses from X-ray computed tomography examinations by a single-array detector unit: Axial versus spiral mode" by Ghavami et al. (1), so according to journal policy and in suitable manner please ask the authors to rep...
متن کاملOn Words, Tests, and Applications: Reply to Faith et al
Faith et al. (2003) strongly criticize our paper (Posadas et al. 2001). Their criticisms are based on what they consider our “ill definitions” and “erroneous applications” of the words complementarity, endemism, and biodiversity. The objectives of our reply to Faith et al. are to demonstrate that their criticisms do not satisfy epistemological and methodological tenets and to compare some aspec...
متن کاملReply to “ Reply to ‘ Comment on “ Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado Front Range –
The reply by Petron et al. [2012a] to my comment, Levi [2012], on their paper, Petron et al. [2012], defends their original conclusion: fugitive emissions in an area that they observed in 2008 were likely larger those indicated by previous estimates. The reply also claims to have now better characterized the uncertainties in their and my approaches. In particular, they question the representati...
متن کامل